Camp Pendleton Presence Helps Oceanside Real Estate Investors

by: Brian.Brady on June 22, 2008 22:30:33     Leave a comment »

Oceanside real estate investors have a long love affair with the Marine Corps.  Camp Pendleton (home to the First Marine Division) supplies a steady stream of young families with a need for oceanside real estate investmentsoff-base housing.  With the average housing allowance of about $1,700 (for an E-5 with a family) and dropping home prices, great opportunities are available for investors.

 

I'm bullish, long-term, on coastal California real estate- that's no secret.  The underlying demographics are still positive for California; more people will be moving in than moving out, over the next 20 years.  Aging baby boomers yearn for warm climes in retirement.  While California has its share of problems, it is still the "promised land" for many Americans.  The presence of the Marine Corps, in Oceanside, just makes the job of a landlord more palatable during this decline.

 

One investor purchased a townhome for $180,000, near the Vandergrift gate,  last month from the REO department of a mortgage lender.  This property sold for over $380,000 in 2005.  With 20% down, a mortgage of $144,000 has a PITI (including HOA) of about $1450.  Market rents are about $1500 and well within the reach of a Camp Pendleton Staff Sergeant.  The property needed some $8,000- $10,000 in repairs but we think the $50,000 required to own and renovate the property.  We think that property can be worth $275,000, in a five year period, and effectively return 15% on the original investment.

 

Have we reached bottom in the San Diego County housing decline?  It's too early to tell but cash-flow positive real estate investments, like we're seeing in Oceanside, certainly take the guesswork of that answer.




Fannie Mae Threw a Party And Nobody Showed Up

by: Brian.Brady on May 22, 2008 17:43:59     1 comment »

The National Association for Realtors convinced FNMA to lift its "declining market" down payment policy:

 

Fannie Mae is scrapping a "declining markets" policy that required loan underwriters to boost minimum down-payment requirements by 5 percent in areas where home prices are falling or difficult to determine.


Beginning in June, Fannie Mae will instead require 3 percent down payments for conventional, conforming mortgages processed through its Desktop Underwriter automated underwriting system, and 5 percent minimum down payments for loans processed manually. Larger down payments may be required depending on occupancy, property and transaction types.


The new single national down-payment policy will retire a controversial declining-market policy announced in December. The policy, implemented Jan. 15, boosted the minimum down payment required by 5 percent when Desktop Underwriter flagged a property as being located in an area of declining home prices or where it was difficult to assess home values. The policy also applied if an appraiser determined a property was in a declining market.

 

Californians rejoice, right?  Not so fast.  There are a few more moving parts in the mortgage industry and the NAR lobby can't provide enough lubricant to remove the rust.  Mortgages with a down payment of less than 20% can't be funded without:

 

a) a corresponding second mortgage for the amount over an 80% loan; NOBODY is making second mortgages at the 95-97% level.

 

b)  private mortgage insurance; the PMI insurers just aren't playing ball.

 

MGIC, the big private mortgage insurer, has their own "restricted markets list".  If the property falls in a restricted market,  down payment and credit requirements are more onerous than the FNMA policy.

 

FNMA threw a party but nobody showed up.




Subprime Mortgages Still Available to San Diegans With Equity

by: Brian.Brady on April 21, 2008 07:42:49     Leave a comment »

Sub-prime mortgage money is scarce in San Diego.  Borrowers with less than perfect credit or undocumentable income are finding that alternative mortgage products, like the loans offered by sub-prime lenders, just aren’t available in 2008.

 

If you need a “band-aid loan” and have plenty of equity, the solution may just be a private money mortgage.

 

Let me give you some examples where private mortgage loans are appropriate and the type of investors I match up with the loan:

 

1- Multi-family: Most banks or commercial lenders will not lend over 55-60% on multi-family in Southern California.  The rents don’t cover the monthly debt service and expenses.  I have three investors who made a living owning and managing apartment complexes.  They know the “secrets’ to undervalued properties that are being leased at below-market rates. They’ll lend up to 75% on those properties if they have a decent borrower. 

 

2- Second Mortgages:  Many properties have low fixed-rate loans on them and the owner does NOT want to refinance a 5.25% first lien,  just to get money out of the property.  “Stated-income” borrowers can’t get a second mortgage at all..  Maybe they just need $50K for some repairs.  They’ll pay 12-15% for that money.  I have seasoned investors that understand that challenge.

 

 

3- Small Business Owners: Many times the small business owner can’t get a quick loan on his property because his credit scores have dropped (he’s maxed out on credit) and he just needs the money for short-term.

 

4- Recent Bankruptcy:  We loaned 70% to a physician who was 6 months out of BK.  The seller carried the 30% balance and the doctor got the house.  We knew the worst was behind him (with the BK) and thought he could refinance in a year.  The investor made 10% on his money, the seller got his price, and my borrower refinanced out of the loans in 18 months. The investor, a retired physician, understood how managed care wreaked havoc on general practitioners in San Diego.

 

If you’re a borrower with a solid equity position, sub-prime mortgage money is still available in San Diego County.  Contact me:

 

Call me at my office at (858)- 777-9751

 

E-mail me at brian (at) californialoanconnection (dot) com

 

Apply for a loan online at http://www.californialoanconnection.com/apply




2008 Housing Market Outlook For U.S. Investors

by: Brian.Brady on November 27, 2007 05:53:58     12 comments »

The U.S. housing market outlook for 2008 is somewhat bleak.  Mortgage defaults continue to rise, flooding certain locales with more inventory, as mortgage lenders seek to rid themselves of poorly performing loans.  The first three months of 2008 may very well be a bloodbath for markets that inflated quickly, regardless of the underlying fundamentals.  Parts of California, Arizona, Florida, and Nevada seem most likely to suffer from this final downward push as the weak borrowers are culled from the herd.

 

Why will the first quarter of 2008 be bleak for housing?  Mortgage companies have been losing money hand over fist, in 2007, due to defaults and short sales.   I think they're delaying the big losses.  REALTORs have been reporting that lenders are becoming increasingly difficult to negotiate short sales in the past few months.  It is conceivable that many lenders expect 2008 to be worse than 2007 and are delaying foreclosure activity and short sales until next year.  They can "hide" the 2007 numbers in the larger numbers of 2008.  It's kind of like limiting your fat intake to 25 grams daily then binging on McDonald's on Fridays.  The huge spike in fat grams, ingested on Friday, won't be absorbed by your body and will "flush through your system" on Saturday.

 

It's a case of pent-up supply.  If lenders have 3-4 months of bad loans on their books ,and flood the market in the beginning of the year, it is most likely that we'll see foreclosure and short sale activity, in the first quarter of 2008, that is twice as large as what we've seen this quarter.  That increased inventory will put downward pressure on prices for the first half of 2008.  The downward spiral, however, should be limited to markets that are driven by lending activity.  Pockets within those markets will be impervious to the fall.  In San Diego County, for example, La Jolla, Del Mar, and Rancho Santa Fe seem to defy gravity as inland communities drop.  Those communities are mostly cash buyers (or low loans to value) while their lesser-priced neighbors rely on mortgage financing.  Paradise Valley, Arcadia, North Central Phoenix and parts of Scottsdale seem to be the resilient pockets in Maricopa County. 

 

It's the old adage that the rich get, well..."not poorer" ...while the poor get ...well...clobbered.  That is not surprising.  The irrational exuberance, displayed by the middle class, during the cheap money orgy, was... well...irrational.  Freshman algebra shows us that when we solve for x, it can't equal y.    The median income, for an area like San Diego County, is $60,000 and the median home price is $493,000.  The affordability equation, even when adjusted for the "sunshine tax" is skewed.  If mortgage financing costs about $8 per thousand, and we allow for a full 50% of the monthly income for housing debt service, which is quite generous, we still come up with a maximum loan amount of about $325,000 for the median income family in San Diego County.  That suggests that a $175,000, down payment from that family; ...that just ain't gonna happen.

 

Incomes, in these markets,  need to rise or....housing prices, in these markets, simply must decline.  If new homeowners don't have the ability to service the debt for a home purchase, they can't buy the property at the inflated price.  Look for median prices to gravitate towards that median income.  In the San Diego County example, that median price should drop to $400,000.  If the "rich get richer", meaning those well-to-do pockets won't drop in value, then the lower end of the market wil get hammered.  Therein lies the long-term investment opportunity for the astute property investor.

 

Housing has utilitarian value, which ultimately trumps economic value.  In short, there is value to owning a home even if it is a bit more expensive than renting.  There is a peace of mind that comes with property ownership.  The ability to paint your walls lime green because it's "you own the sumbitch" does allow for a premium to the traditional investment formula.  So, in Phoenix, while the economic value of a home that leases for $700/month may be $130,000, the utilitarian value may go as high as $170,000.  If a tenant pays $700 to lease that home, a good borrower could own that home, with no downpayment, for $1133/month or about $850 in after-tax dollars.  The question then becomes, "Is $150/month worth it for the right to paint the walls lime green?"  I think that the answer is yes.

Read more »




Mortgages in California: Blood in the Streets

by: Brian.Brady on November 26, 2007 18:16:42     Leave a comment »


I wrote an article about the California Governor's brokered deal with loan servicers:

 

Is this measure politically motivated? You betchya. The Governator is taking care of his own, regardless of the inequities it levies on the rest of the country. The lenders are in a bind so they’ll appreciate this artificial market stabilization until the rest of the country catches up. This is Nixonian economics, plain and simple. THAT interventionist policy exacerbated rather than solved the problem of inflation.

 

What I’m about to say will be unpopular in the Golden State; housing prices are artificially inflated and need to come down meet rational economic models. Borrowers who make $90,000 annually can’t afford $700,000 homes. You can intervene in markets but the price of Amsterdam tulips will naturally gravitate towards its real economic value.

 

While I don't like the idea of reckless borrowers getting a free ride, Robert Kerr exposed the insidious nature of the lenders' motivation in this comment:

 

This CA proposal has to rank right up there with the most well-disguised scams of all time. The Governor is busy patting himself on the back, the press is fawning over the lenders’ benevolence …and the lenders are laughing all the way to the bank.

 

This isn’t a bailout, it’s Loan Sharking 101. When your borrower starts drowning under the vig, you cut back the vig, roll it over onto the principal and keep bleeding, at a slower rate.

 

Did Arnold’s advisors get this great idea from watching Richie Aprile run his shy on The Sopranos?

 

An upside-down borrower with a $400K mortgage on a $300K home isn’t helped with temporarily frozen payments. If the lenders really wanted to help, they would reappraise and write off some or all of the overvaluation.

 

Did he really just say that?  He compared the loan servicers to organized crime?  Yes, he did.  I liked his analogy so much that I've been using it in comments today.

Read more »